Dpanel Network Create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It states that a network is created and lists supported drivers, but does not disclose permissions required, whether the operation is reversible, side effects, or conflict handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded: the first sentence states the action, and the second gives a key enum constraint. It avoids waste, though the first sentence largely restates the tool title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and 0% schema description coverage, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the required 'name' parameter, default driver behavior, or any operational context. An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, but the input side is under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description compensates partially by listing the allowed driver values (bridge|macvlan|ipvlan|overlay), which the schema itself does not encode as an enum. However, the required 'name' parameter remains completely undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('创建网络' = create network), which clearly identifies the operation. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling network tools such as dpanel_network_delete or dpanel_network_list, but the name and description together are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dpanel_network_connect or dpanel_network_prune. The purpose is implied by the verb, but no prerequisites, exclusions, or usage context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.