Dpanel Container Backup List

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden, and it discloses nothing beyond the bare noun phrase. It does not mention pagination, ordering, or what fields a backup entry contains, though 'list' weakly implies a read-only retrieval.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short phrase with no waste, but it is under-specified rather than concise — brevity here comes at the cost of any informative content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values needn't be explained, and the tool takes no parameters, which lowers the burden. Still, with no annotations and no sibling differentiation, an agent has almost nothing to decide when to call this versus the other backup tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to clarify; the baseline of 4 applies for a no-argument tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '容器备份列表' is essentially a restatement of the tool name and title ('Dpanel Container Backup List'), with no verb or added scope. It does not distinguish this list tool from siblings such as dpanel_container_backup_detail or dpanel_container_backup_restore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is given. Among a dense sibling set (backup_detail, backup_create, backup_delete, backup_restore), the description never states that this is the enumeration entry point versus the detail or mutation tools, leaving routing entirely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.