Dpanel Registry Delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and does disclose two important behavioral facts: the operation is destructive and requires confirm=true. However, it does not mention irreversibility, permission requirements, or failure modes beyond the confirmation gate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that front-loads the core action and then appends the destructive/confirmation constraint. No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described. However, for a destructive two-parameter tool with 0% schema description coverage and no annotations, the description is missing parameter semantics for id and broader operational context, making it only minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for both parameters. It clarifies that confirm=true is required, but it says nothing about the required id parameter (e.g., whether it is a registry ID or name, or its format), leaving a significant semantic gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('删除') and resource ('镜像仓库'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling registry operations such as dpanel_registry_create, dpanel_registry_list, and dpanel_registry_detail.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the delete action and the destructive warning, but the description does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. The confirm=true prerequisite is stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.