Dpanel Registry List

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, whether pagination applies, or whether registries are scoped to a user/workspace. The minimal phrase '列表' implies a retrieval but adds no behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, very short sentence. It is concise but so terse that it fails to add any informative content beyond the tool name. Still, from a purely structural standpoint it is front-loaded and waste-free.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While an output schema exists (relieving the need to describe return values), the description remains critically incomplete. With no annotations and no parameter context, it should at minimum clarify that this returns a list of configured image registries and that it is a safe read. As written, an agent gains nothing beyond the tool name.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. Per the rubric, 0 params yields a baseline of 4. The description does not need to explain parameters, and its brevity here does not hurt.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '镜像仓库列表。' (image registry list) essentially restates the tool name and title. It provides no verb or scope detail beyond what the name already conveys, and offers no distinction from the sibling dpanel_registry_detail.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool or how it relates to siblings like dpanel_registry_detail, dpanel_registry_create, or dpanel_registry_delete. The description does not indicate it should be used to enumerate existing registries before selecting one.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.