Dpanel Cron Run Once

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral load. Since an output schema exists, return values needn't be explained, but the description doesn't state whether this requires specific permissions, what happens if the task is already running, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence that is front-loaded and efficient. It could be slightly more informative without being verbose, but it is appropriately concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, an output schema, and a single undocumented parameter, the description is minimally adequate. It lacks details on behavior, permissions, and the meaning of the 'id' parameter, which would help an agent invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate for the undocumented 'id' parameter. The description provides no information about the parameter, leaving the agent without guidance on what 'id' refers to or its format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '立即执行一次计划任务' clearly states the action (run once immediately) and resource (scheduled task), distinguishing it from sibling dpanel_cron_list and dpanel_cron_detail. However, it doesn't name the alternative or clarify scope beyond the action itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word '立即' implies immediate execution as opposed to scheduled, which hints at when to use it, but there are no explicit when-to-use statements, exclusions, or references to alternatives like dpanel_cron_list or dpanel_cron_detail.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.