show_userdetails
Retrieve detailed information about an Anaplan user by providing their user ID.
Instructions
Get user details by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | Anaplan user ID |
Retrieve detailed information about an Anaplan user by providing their user ID.
Get user details by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | Anaplan user ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states a read operation but omits permissions required, what specific details are returned, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no extraneous words, achieving maximum conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is insufficiently complete. It does not specify what 'user details' entails, leaving the agent unaware of the return structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single 'userId' parameter described as 'Anaplan user ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, meeting baseline but not exceeding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get user details by ID' clearly states a specific verb ('get') and resource ('user details'), with a clear parameter (by ID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tool 'show_users', which lists all users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'show_users' or 'show_viewdetails'. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/larasrinath/anaplan-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server