set_versionswitchover

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description warns that the action 'affects version boundaries', but without annotations, it does not disclose other behavioral traits such as reversibility, permissions needed, or impact on dependent data. More details would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. Warning is placed first for immediate impact, followed by essential usage hints. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the full schema descriptions and concise behavioral warning, the description is adequate for a setter tool with three parameters. No output schema is needed, and the description covers prerequisites and an example.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description adds value by clarifying that modelId requires an ID (name not supported), versionId comes from show_versions, and date can be an empty string to reset. This enhances understanding beyond the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Set version switchover date' with a specific verb and resource. The warning about affecting version boundaries adds specificity, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like set_currentperiod or set_fiscalyear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance: use show_versions to find versionId, and note that model ID is required and name resolution is not supported. It does not explicitly state when not to use, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.