get_page
Fetch a modern SharePoint page by its ID to access its content and metadata.
Instructions
Get a modern page.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes |
Fetch a modern SharePoint page by its ID to access its content and metadata.
Get a modern page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Get' implies a read operation, but the description does not state return format, error behavior, permissions required, or any side effects. This is a minimal disclosure for a tool with no structured safety hints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
At four words, the description is terse but not usefully concise. It omits essential context, making it under-specified rather than efficiently structured. A good concise description would still communicate key details like 'by pageId'.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter getter, the description is minimally complete, but the lack of output schema and annotations increases the burden on the description. It does not clarify what 'modern page' means, what data is returned, or any limitations, leaving significant gaps for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has one required parameter 'pageId' with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain what pageId is, its format, or how it relates to the page being fetched. The parameter name is somewhat self-explanatory, but the description adds no value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a clear verb ('Get') and resource ('a modern page'), indicating it retrieves a single page. However, it lacks explicit mention of retrieval by pageId and doesn't differentiate from list_pages or other page-related tools beyond implying singular vs. plural.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_pages or get_context. There is no mention of prerequisites, intended use cases, or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/icemage001/local_sharepoint_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server