lc_preview_set_playbook_enabled

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must bear full weight. It only states 'Preview toggling' but does not explain what 'preview' entails—whether it is idempotent, what permissions are required, or what the outcome is. This under-disclosure is risky for a mutation preview tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (11 words), which is concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It front-loads the action and resource but leaves out critical information about the tool's behavior and parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a preview tool for a potentially risky action (toggling enabled state), the description is incomplete. It lacks explanation of the preview scope, return value (no output schema), and prerequisites. The description does not compensate for the absent annotations or schema details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters (oid, name, enabled, token_ttl_seconds). Without any explanation, the agent cannot infer what values to provide for oid and name, or how enabled toggling works with them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it previews toggling the enabled metadata of a playbook Hive record, which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like lc_preview_set_playbook or lc_set_playbook. The verb 'Preview toggling' is specific, but the phrasing could be more precise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to preview versus directly set enabled state, or what prerequisites are needed. Among many similar preview actions, the description lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.