lc_preview_set_fp_rule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description is the sole source of behavioral info. 'Preview' implies non-destructive, but it doesn't explicitly state that no actual changes are made, what side effects occur, or any permissions needed. The term 'preview' is ambiguous without elaboration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single phrase, but it is under-specified, not concise. It omits essential context and would benefit from additional sentences to improve clarity without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex input schema (nested objects, 9 parameters), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is critically incomplete. It does not explain the preview behavior, return value, or any constraints, leaving the agent with insufficient information to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description provides zero parameter information. It does not explain what 'oid', 'data', 'name', 'etag', etc. mean, nor does it clarify the expected structure of the 'data' object. This is insufficient for an agent to correctly fill parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'preview' and the resource 'false-positive rule', distinguishing it from sibling preview_set tools by resource type. It could be more explicit about what 'preview' means (e.g., dry-run without applying changes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many lc_preview_set_* siblings, there is no context explaining that this is for previewing a false-positive rule change before committing, or what distinguishes it from other similar tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.