lc_preview_create_org

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Preview creating a new organization' but does not specify whether this operation has side effects, what it validates, or what the output contains. The term 'Preview' implies no permanent change, but this is not made explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but potentially too sparse. It lacks structure and front-loads only the basic purpose. While no unnecessary words exist, the brevity sacrifices valuable information that could aid the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, no output schema, numerous sibling preview tools), the description is incomplete. It does not clarify what the preview returns, how it differs from actual creation, or any constraints. The agent would need additional context to use this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage, yet the description adds no explanation for any parameter (name, location, template, token_ttl_seconds). The agent receives no semantic help beyond parameter names and types, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Preview) and the resource (creating a new organization), distinguishing it from sibling preview tools for other resources. However, it does not elaborate on what the preview entails, which may leave some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., lc_create_org or lc_check_org_name). The description does not indicate prerequisites, conditions, or when not to use it, leaving the agent to infer from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.