lc_preview_remove_group_member

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'preview' implies it does not execute the removal, but the description does not explicitly state that no changes are made, what the output looks like, or any other behaviors. With no annotations, the description carries full burden and falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, but it is under-specified. While concise, it does not provide enough information to be useful, making it closer to a tautology.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a preview tool with no output schema, the description should explain what the preview returns and how to interpret it. It is incomplete, leaving the agent without essential context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not add any parameter-specific meaning beyond the schema. It does not explain email format, group_id context, or token_ttl_seconds purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'preview removing' and the resource 'user from group members'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'lc_preview_add_group_member' and 'lc_preview_remove_group_owner' by specifying the action and target.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention that it should be used before a real removal, nor does it compare to other preview or action tools. Lacks prerequisites like requiring the user to be a member.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.