lc_list_lookups
Fetch lookup Hive records for a specified organization ID. Use the optional limit parameter to control result count.
Instructions
List lookup Hive records.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| oid | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Fetch lookup Hive records for a specified organization ID. Use the optional limit parameter to control result count.
List lookup Hive records.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| oid | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the action. It does not disclose return type, pagination (despite a limit parameter), or any behavioral traits such as whether it lists all records or requires specific permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single under-specified sentence. While short, it does not earn its place due to vagueness and lack of structure.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to specify what the function returns, any constraints, or how to use it effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no information about the two parameters (oid, limit). The description must compensate but fails to do so.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List lookup Hive records' uses a specific verb+resource pattern, clearly indicating it returns a list of lookup Hive records. It distinguishes from sibling tools like lc_get_lookup (single record), though it does not clarify what a 'lookup' is in this context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., lc_get_lookup for a single record). The description lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/geoffbelknap/limacharlie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server