lc_preview_remove_group_org

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description only says 'Preview removing,' implying a dry-run, but does not disclose side effects, authorization requirements, or the nature of the preview (e.g., what is returned). Minimal behavioral information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one sentence), but at the cost of omitting critical details. While front-loaded, it sacrifices completeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and three undocumented parameters, the description fails to provide sufficient context for an AI agent to invoke this tool correctly. It does not explain return values, parameter use, or the preview mechanism.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain any of the three parameters (group_id, member_oid, token_ttl_seconds), leaving their purpose unclear beyond the schema's field names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Preview removing an organization from a group,' specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like lc_preview_add_group_org by focusing on removal. However, it lacks explanation of what 'preview' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as lc_confirm_action or lc_cancel_action. The description does not provide context for invocation or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.