lc_preview_dismiss_org_error

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'Preview' suggests a non-destructive simulation, but the description does not explicitly confirm no side effects, auth requirements, or output format. With no annotations, the description fails to provide adequate transparency about behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it is under-specified. It lacks critical details, making it more of a placeholder than a helpful guide.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and many sibling preview tools, the description is far from complete. It does not explain what 'component' or 'oid' refer to, how token_ttl_seconds is used, or what the preview result looks like.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameter descriptions are provided in the input schema (0% coverage), and the description does not mention or explain any of the three parameters (oid, component, token_ttl_seconds). This leaves the agent with no semantic meaning beyond parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Preview dismissing one organization component error' gives a basic idea of the action but uses vague terms like 'component' and doesn't specify what the preview entails. It barely distinguishes from other preview tools, which all start with 'lc_preview_', but it does indicate it's a preview operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling preview tools for different actions (add, remove, set, etc.), the lack of context leaves the agent without decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.