cigchat_flow_create_shortcut

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the required 'Manage Flow' scope, which is a useful behavioral requirement beyond the schema. However, with no annotations, it does not detail other behavioral aspects such as side effects, reversibility, or response behavior. It partially covers the transparency burden but leaves gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, information-dense sentence. It includes the action, endpoint, and authorization requirement without any padding or repetition. Excellent conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not explain what happens after creation (e.g., success response, return value). It also does not clarify how 'current flow' is determined or if there are prerequisites beyond the scope. These gaps make it incomplete for an agent making the call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with examples for both 'name' and 'value'. The description adds no further meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Create a shortcut for the current flow' with a specific endpoint. The verb 'create' and resource 'shortcut' are explicit, and referencing 'current flow' distinguishes it from sibling tools like update_shortcut or delete_shortcut.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it implies a flow context, it does not mention related tools like update_shortcut or list_shortcuts or any exclusions. The description only states what it does, not when to choose it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.