update_task
Update an existing task by modifying its title, status, importance, or due date.
Instructions
Update an existing task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listId | Yes | Task list ID | |
| taskId | Yes | Task ID | |
| updates | Yes | Fields to update |
Update an existing task by modifying its title, status, importance, or due date.
Update an existing task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listId | Yes | Task list ID | |
| taskId | Yes | Task ID | |
| updates | Yes | Fields to update |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only implies mutation via 'Update' but lacks details on permissions, side effects, idempotency, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but overly minimal; it does not waste words but misses critical details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and a nested parameter, the description is insufficient. It lacks context on return values, success criteria, or constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Update an existing task', matching the tool's purpose. Distinguishes from siblings like create_task, but no explicit differentiation from update_calendar_event or update_contact.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use or alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, when not to use, or contrast with sibling tools like create_task or delete_calendar_event.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/eesb99/office365-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server