remove_board_card_label

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral detail about the return value when the label exists but is not attached (detached=false). However, it does not disclose behavior for missing labels or cards, or the success response. Annotations already provide idempotent and non-destructive hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: one stating the core action and one clarifying a specific return case. It is concise and front-loaded with the primary purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with 3 required params and strong annotations, the description covers the core action and an edge case. However, it lacks mention of success return or error conditions. The presence of an output schema likely compensates for the return structure, keeping completeness high.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions are generic ('a string that will be trimmed'), and the tool description does not clarify what the parameters represent (e.g., IDs or names). No additional semantic value is provided beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Detach a board label from one board card', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like add_board_card_label and list_board_card_labels.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites or context are mentioned, such as requiring the label or card to exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.