Skip to main content
Glama

list_board_saved_views

Read-onlyIdempotent

List read-only saved filtered views for boards, filterable by visibility (own, shared, or all) and optional name search.

Instructions

Read-only list of board saved filtered views. Queries view.class.FilteredView where attachedTo = board.app.Board and reports own/shared visibility.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
visibilityNoFilter board saved views by whether the current account is in the saved view users list.
nameSearchNoOptional saved view name substring search.
limitNoMaximum number of board saved views to return (default: 50).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesThe successful tool result. The same value is also serialized as JSON in the text content for clients that do not read structuredContent.
warningsNoOptional agent-visible warnings about degraded result fidelity. Omitted when the server returned the documented happy-path payload.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds that it queries specific classes and filters by attachedTo and visibility, but doesn't disclose behavioral traits beyond what annotations already cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Could be slightly more structured, but effectively communicates the core action and query logic.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values are covered. Description explains the query logic but omits context around pagination (limit parameter) and nameSearch behavior, which are in the schema but could be reinforced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description repeats visibility enum values but adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('list') and resource ('board saved filtered views'), and distinguishes from siblings like 'get_board_saved_view' by specifying it returns a list filtered by visibility and query conditions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_board_saved_view for a single view, list_boards for all boards). Missing explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dearlordylord/huly-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server