create_teamspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims idempotency (returns existing if same name exists) but annotations have idempotentHint: false, creating a direct contradiction. This is a severe inconsistency that misleads the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise with no fluff—single sentence plus clause. However, it could be better structured to include usage context; still efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes creation and idempotency but lacks details on behavior when a teamspace with same name exists (merge vs return vs error). No output schema or permission hints. Adequate but gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add meaning beyond the existing parameter descriptions. No param details in the description itself, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new Huly document teamspace' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes it from sibling create tools like create_card or create_channel. The idempotency behavior further clarifies purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_teamspace or get_teamspace. No prerequisites or exclusions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.