delete_drive_file_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true. The description adds 'Permanently delete' (confirming irreversibility) and the locator constraint, which are behavioral details beyond annotations. Could mention error handling for missing comments.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundancy. First sentence captures the action and locator options; second clarifies scope. Every word is necessary and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity and available annotations/schema, the description covers the key points: action, locator constraint, and clarification about deleting only the comment. It could mention permissions or what happens if the comment doesn't exist, but overall sufficient for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with generic descriptions. The description adds semantic value by explaining the mutual exclusivity of filePath and fileId, which is not evident from the schema alone. This helps the agent choose between the two locators.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'delete' and the resource 'comment from a Drive file', with clarification that it's not deleting the file. It distinguishes from siblings like delete_comment (which might be for other comment types) and delete_drive_item (which deletes the file).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance to 'Provide only one locator' and clarifies that only the comment is deleted, not the file. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like delete_comment or delete_drive_item, nor does it state when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.