list_huly_domain_index_configurations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds value by detailing the return format: 'Returns each domain plus disabled, skip, and enabled-index summaries while preserving SDK-open index/filter/config payloads as typed metadata,' which provides behavioral insight beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, concise, but contains jargon ('SDK-open index/filter/config payloads as typed metadata') that may reduce clarity. Could be more readable, but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, rich annotations, and presence of an output schema, the description is complete. It explains what the tool returns and the nature of the data (read-only, typed metadata). No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist (schema coverage 100%, 0 params). Baseline score of 4 is appropriate; description does not need to add parameter info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists read-only Huly domain index configuration records from a specific class (core.class.DomainIndexConfiguration), using specific verb 'List' and resource. It distinguishes itself among sibling list tools by targeting a unique data domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing domain index configurations but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any exclusions. Sibling tools are all list_* variants, so context is assumed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.