daz_execute_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes inputs and return values (success, result, output, error) but does not disclose side effects, permissions, or whether execution is synchronous. Since no annotations exist, description carries full burden but partially addresses it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise one-line purpose followed by clear parameter and return bullet points. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple execution tool with two parameters and a structured output. Could mention environment constraints like file path accessibility, but overall complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Each parameter (script_file with absolute path and file extensions, args as JSON object accessible in script) is fully explained beyond the schema, which had 0% coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool executes a DazScript file on disk, using specific verbs and resource. It implicitly differentiates from sibling 'daz_execute' which likely runs inline scripts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like daz_execute or daz_validate_script. The description only explains the tool itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.