Update Account Setting

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the key behavioral trait that the operation is a full replacement, not a partial update, which goes beyond the annotation metadata. It also scopes to 'current account', providing additional context beyond the readOnlyHint/idempotentHint annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the HTTP method and endpoint, and includes the essential replacement semantics without any filler. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a straightforward update operation with well-documented parameters and annotations, the description covers the core behavior (full replacement) and scope. It does not mention response format, but with no output schema and simple update semantics, this is a minor gap given the strong schema and annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all parameters. The description itself does not add parameter-level meaning, but the schema already provides adequate detail (e.g., data replaces existing, type must match). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a specific AccountSetting by ID via PUT, distinguishing it from create/list operations. It names the resource and the action with precision.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for updating an existing setting by referencing 'replaces the existing configuration,' but it does not explicitly contrast with creating a new setting using gorgias_create_account_setting. Usage context is implied rather than explicitly directed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.