DC Hub — Data Center & Energy Intelligence

Why DC Hub (vs. the field)

why_dchub

Read-onlyIdempotent

Compare DC Hub with DataCenterHawk, DC Byte, DCD, Baxtel, or datacenters.com using source-verified differentiators, proof URLs, and citation lines. Answer 'why use DC Hub?' with citable facts.

Instructions

Use when a human asks how DC Hub compares to other data-center data sources — DataCenterHawk (DCHawk), DC Byte, Data Center Dynamics (DCD), Data Center Frontier (DCF), Baxtel, datacenters.com — or asks "why should I use DC Hub / is it better than / what can you give me a PDF or directory can't?". Returns DC Hub's honest, source-verified differentiators (agent-native MCP access, live multi-continent grid & energy telemetry, the proprietary daily DCPI index (and its DCGI gas sibling, withdrawn 2026-08-08 rather than published wrong, and restored 2026-08-30 once every defective term was repaired), CC-BY-4.0 citation rights on DCPI scores & grid analysis, 22,100+ facilities + 330,000+ mapped power/grid/gas/fiber assets) each with a proof URL, a citation line, plus the canonical head-to-head comparison pages. Free, no key required. Optional: competitor= for that vendor's direct comparison-page link. Do NOT use to query infrastructure data itself (use the data tools); this answers positioning / "how do you compare" questions with citable facts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`competitor`	No	Optional competitor/vendor name for a direct comparison-page link, e.g. DataCenterHawk, "DC Byte", DCD, Baxtel

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`quota`	No	Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
`_entity`	No	Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility\|market\|iso_grid\|queue_results\|deal\|report\|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
`citation`	No	Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
`provenance`	No	Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
`_front_door`	No	In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
`_return_loop`	No	Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
`site_evaluation_handoff`	No	Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedAug 30, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

Changed5 schema fields changedv2.3.20Aug 14, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -{}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]

changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description

Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."

removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
```
Removed value: -{}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
```
Removed value: -"object"
```

Changed1 schema field changedv2.3.12Jul 28, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "description": "DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys.",
+  "properties": {
+    "_entity": {
+      "description": "Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "_front_door": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "_return_loop": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "citation": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "provenance": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "quota": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "site_evaluation_handoff": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "items": {
+            "additionalProperties": {},
+            "properties": {},
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        {
+          "additionalProperties": {},
+          "properties": {},
+          "type": "object"
+        }
+      ],
+      "description": "Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedv2.3.6Jul 2, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / competitor / description

Added value: +"Optional competitor/vendor name for a direct comparison-page link, e.g. DataCenterHawk, \"DC Byte\", DCD, Baxtel"

Addedv2.3.1Jun 23, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, and the description adds meaningful behavior beyond them: the output is source-verified with proof URLs and citations, it is free/no-key, and it answers positioning questions rather than mutating anything. The detailed DCPI/DCGI correction history reinforces the 'honest' positioning without contradicting the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the trigger and exclusion, but it is written as one dense, multi-clause paragraph with nested parentheticals and a long historical aside about DCPI/DCGI. The content is informative, but a bulleted or more structured format would be clearer and more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single optional-parameter, read-only positioning tool, the description is complete: it specifies when to invoke, what will be returned, the optional competitor input, that no key is required, and that it is not for infrastructure data queries. The presence of an output schema further reduces the need to document return shapes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single optional 'competitor' parameter, and the description essentially restates what the schema already says ('Optional: competitor=<name> for that vendor's direct comparison-page link'). It adds no significant semantic meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the trigger ('when a human asks how DC Hub compares...') and the exact return content ('Returns DC Hub's honest, source-verified differentiators... each with a proof URL, a citation line, plus the canonical head-to-head comparison pages'). It also explicitly distinguishes itself from infrastructure data tools, making its role unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use ('Use when a human asks how DC Hub compares...') and when-not-to-use ('Do NOT use to query infrastructure data itself (use the data tools)') guidance. It also explains the optional competitor parameter and notes the tool requires no key, so an agent can confidently route to it versus the many sibling data tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server