Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub: Data Center, Power Grid & Energy Intelligence

Permitting & Moratorium Intel

get_permitting_intel
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check jurisdiction-level data center permitting risks: human-verified moratorium, zoning, tax, and utility-pause records to determine whether a site is blocked or restricted.

Instructions

Use this when the user asks about data center permitting or moratoriums — curated, HUMAN-VERIFIED jurisdiction records: moratoriums, zoning restrictions, tax changes, utility pauses. Each record is stage-tagged (read the detail prefix: "Enacted" / "Proposed" / "Speculative"), with jurisdiction, state/country, the source article URL, and map coordinates. The permitting-risk axis for site selection that no other machine-readable source serves — e.g. New York's statewide >=50MW moratorium, county-level halts. FREE and full for every caller. Answers "is there a moratorium where I want to build", "which jurisdictions just tightened data-center zoning". Try: get_permitting_intel class=moratorium — or state=MN. Rendered live as the Permitting & Zoning layer on https://dchub.cloud/land-power-map. Do NOT use for tax INCENTIVE programs by state (use get_tax_incentives); this tracks restrictions and risk per jurisdiction.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
classNoRecord class: "moratorium" | "zoning" | "tax" | "utility_pause" (optional)
stateNoUS state filter, e.g. NY or MN (optional)

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changedv2.12.45
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -{}New value: +true
    • removedOutput schema / description
      Removed value: -"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _entity
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _front_door
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Next-session delta call (get_changes).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / quota
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": {},
      -        "properties": {},
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
      -}
  2. Changed8 schema fields changedv2.12.43
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys."New value: +"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _entity / description
      Previous value: -"Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest."New value: +"Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _front_door / description
      Previous value: -"In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan."New value: +"First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop / description
      Previous value: -"Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed."New value: +"Next-session delta call (get_changes)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."New value: +"How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / provenance / description
      Previous value: -"Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing."New value: +"Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / quota / description
      Previous value: -"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available."New value: +"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / description
      Previous value: -"Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."New value: +"Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  4. Changed5 schema fields changedv2.3.20
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
      Removed value: -"object"
  5. Addedv2.3.12

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world), yet the description adds real context beyond them: human-verified provenance, stage tagging via a detail prefix, source URL and coordinates per record, and access terms ('FREE and full for every caller'). It stops short of disclosing record freshness/update cadence, which matters for a risk dataset an agent may rely on for decisions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the trigger and the record types, and the exclusion sits at the end where a routing caveat belongs. It carries some promotional filler ('the permitting-risk axis for site selection that no other machine-readable source serves') and a rendering URL that do not help the agent call the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. The description covers what is returned (stage tags, jurisdiction, state/country, source URL, coordinates), when to use it, the alternative to avoid, and the access model — everything needed to call a zero-required-param read tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so both filters are already documented, giving a baseline of 3. The description goes slightly beyond by showing concrete invocation syntax ('class=moratorium — or state=MN'), which clarifies how the filters combine in practice rather than just restating them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource with concrete scope: 'curated, HUMAN-VERIFIED jurisdiction records: moratoriums, zoning restrictions, tax changes, utility pauses.' It also names the sibling it is NOT (get_tax_incentives), so an agent can separate permitting risk from incentive programs without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit trigger ('Use this when the user asks about data center permitting or moratoriums'), explicit exclusion ('Do NOT use for tax INCENTIVE programs by state (use get_tax_incentives)'), and example queries ('is there a moratorium where I want to build', 'which jurisdictions just tightened data-center zoning'). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools