Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub Intelligence

Grid Intelligence

get_grid_intelligence
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve live grid capacity, demand, and reliability data for a single US ISO or market, including headroom, time-to-power, and reserve margin.

Instructions

Use this whenever the user asks about grid capacity, demand or reliability for one grid region. Call when the user asks about power availability, headroom or time-to-power in a US ISO (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE) or a market's grid. Returns live demand, fuel mix, queue depth, DCPI excess-power and constraint scores, time-to-power, reserve margin. avg_time_to_power_months and avg_queue_wait_months are DIFFERENT measurements; quote the one you mean. With a free key, a few full briefs a day; keyless gets a trimmed preview. Unlimited needs a paid key. Ex: "PJM headroom for 200 MW?"

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
isoNoAlias for region_id — the ISO/RTO or balancing-authority code
marketNoMarket NAME or metro slug instead of a grid code, e.g. "Ashburn", "northern-virginia", "dallas". Resolved to its ISO through the published DCPI market row before the brief is built; the answer carries a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to. Not an alias for region_id — "Ashburn" is not a grid code.
regionNoAlias for region_id — the ISO/RTO or balancing-authority code
region_idNoGrid region (required): one of the 7 US ISOs (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE), an EIA balancing-authority code (e.g. SOCO, DUK, AZPS, TVA), or the PJM Dominion zone region_id="PJM-DOM" for live Ashburn / Northern Virginia zone load + real-time LMP (the world's #1 DC market, invisible in EIA)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
_entityNoPayload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
citationNoMachine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
provenanceNoCollection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
_front_doorNoIn-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
_return_loopNoSuggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
site_evaluation_handoffNoPre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.12.20
    • addedInput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "region_id": {}
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "region_id"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "iso": {}
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "iso"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "region": {}
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "region"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "market": {}
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "market"
      +    ]
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / properties / market
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Market NAME or metro slug instead of a grid code, e.g. \"Ashburn\", \"northern-virginia\", \"dallas\". Resolved to its ISO through the published DCPI market row before the brief is built; the answer carries a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to. Not an alias for region_id — \"Ashburn\" is not a grid code.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  3. Changed5 schema fields changedv2.3.20
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
      Removed value: -"object"
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv2.3.12
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "_entity": {
      +      "description": "Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "_front_door": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "_return_loop": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "citation": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "provenance": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "quota": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "site_evaluation_handoff": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "items": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {},
      +            "properties": {},
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "properties": {},
      +          "type": "object"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "description": "Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. Changed1 schema field changedv2.3.7
    • changedInput schema / properties / region_id / description
      Previous value: -"Grid region (required): one of the 7 US ISOs (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE) or an EIA balancing-authority code, e.g. SOCO, DUK, AZPS, TVA"New value: +"Grid region (required): one of the 7 US ISOs (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE), an EIA balancing-authority code (e.g. SOCO, DUK, AZPS, TVA), or the PJM Dominion zone region_id=\"PJM-DOM\" for live Ashburn / Northern Virginia zone load + real-time LMP (the world's #1 DC market, invisible in EIA)"
  6. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.3.6
    • addedInput schema / properties / iso / description
      Added value: +"Alias for region_id — the ISO/RTO or balancing-authority code"
    • addedInput schema / properties / region / description
      Added value: +"Alias for region_id — the ISO/RTO or balancing-authority code"
    • addedInput schema / properties / region_id / description
      Added value: +"Grid region (required): one of the 7 US ISOs (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE) or an EIA balancing-authority code, e.g. SOCO, DUK, AZPS, TVA"
  7. First observedv2.1.19

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (which already declare a safe, idempotent, non-destructive read), the description discloses access-tier behavior: free key yields a few full briefs per day, keyless callers get a trimmed preview, and unlimited use requires a paid key. It also flags a real semantic trap — avg_time_to_power_months and avg_queue_wait_months are different measurements — which is exactly the kind of behavioral guidance structured fields cannot carry.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is front-loaded with the triggering condition and an example, and every sentence carries signal (returns list, measurement warning, access tiers). It is dense and somewhat run-on — the keyless/free/paid key sentence plus the measurement caveat could be tightened — but nothing is padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, yet the description already covers access tiers, alias behavior, and the key input vocabulary. The main remaining gap is routing relative to near-neighbor siblings (compare_isos, get_iso_context, get_grid_data), which the description leaves implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: the schema already explains that iso/region are aliases for region_id, that market is resolved via the DCPI row rather than being an alias, and lists the accepted ISO/BA codes and the PJM-DOM special case. The description largely restates those facts (ISO list, market resolution, alias relationship), so it adds little meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb-plus-resource: retrieve grid capacity/demand/reliability intelligence for a single grid region, and enumerates the concrete returns (live demand, fuel mix, queue depth, DCPI, time-to-power, reserve margin). The 'one grid region' scoping implicitly separates it from multi-region siblings such as compare_isos and get_grid_scoreboard. An agent can tell what this tool answers without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states clearly when to call (user asks about grid capacity, demand, reliability, power availability, headroom, or time-to-power) and scopes it to US ISOs, including a concrete example query. It stops short of naming alternatives or when-not-to-use cases — e.g., it never points to compare_isos for multi-ISO comparison or get_grid_scoreboard for ranked views.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools