Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub — Data Center & Energy Intelligence

Get Refined Queue

get_refined_queue
Read-onlyIdempotent

Filter the 5,300-project US ISO interconnection queue server-side by capacity, fuel type, ISO, and time-to-power, returning only matching projects with site-evaluation details.

Instructions

Server-side SET-REDUCTION over the US ISO interconnection queue (~5,300 projects, 7 ISOs, ~1,744 GW). Instead of pulling the raw queue into context to filter (token-expensive, error-prone), push the predicates to the data layer and get back ONLY the survivors. Filter by min_mw, max_ttp_months (ISO-level avg interconnection wait), iso (comma-union), baseload_only (firm/dispatchable — excludes wind/solar/storage), fuel_type (isolate a specific fuel, e.g. gas or nuclear), and the spatial predicates max_fiber_km + geocoded_only. Returns _entity=queue_results: per-project name, ISO, state/county, fuel_type, capacity_mw, queue_status, estimated_ttp_months, fuel_class, plus (~83% of rows) lat/lng, coordinate_precision, fiber_km, and a compact per-survivor site_evaluation_handoff (ready-to-pipe analyze_site + get_water_risk args) + a by_iso/by_fuel summary. Try: get_refined_queue min_mw=1000 fuel_type=gas max_ttp_months=34 — "1 GW+ gas in ISOs under 34-month time-to-power." NOTE max_ttp_months is a HARD ISO cut (SPP ~24 is the only ISO under 30, so <=30 can return nothing); use >=34 to include MISO/ERCOT/ISO-NE. Use for high-cardinality siting/arbitrage scans; do NOT use for the ISO-level GW aggregate (use get_interconnection_queue) or a single-site read (use analyze_site). Phase 2 LIVE: pipe a survivor's site_evaluation_handoff straight into analyze_site for a one-call composite viability read. CANDIDATE CONTRACT (2026-07-11): every survivor also mints a durable opaque candidate_id + snapshot_id (7-day TTL, deterministic candidate_expired on lapse — never a silent recompute). ZERO-DRIFT CHAINING: pass candidate_id to analyze_site / rank_sites instead of transposing coordinates — downstream reads the FROZEN mint, eliminating param-rename/rounding/lost-context drift. geocoded_only=true guarantees every survivor carries both the handoff AND frozen coordinates. Contract doc: dchub.cloud/docs/candidate-lifecycle.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
isoNoRestrict to one or more ISOs, comma-separated for a union: PJM, ERCOT, MISO, CAISO, SPP, NYISO, ISONE (ISO-NE). e.g. iso=ERCOT,PJM. Omit for all; combines with max_ttp_months as an intersection
limitNoMax results to return (1-500; default varies by tool)
min_mwNoMinimum project capacity in MW, e.g. 1000 for 1 GW+
statusNoQueue status filter. Default 'active' = still progressing (excludes withdrawn/cancelled/suspended/in-commercial-operation) — cross-ISO safe (SPP labels live projects 'IA FULLY EXECUTED/ON SCHEDULE' not 'active'). Pass 'all' for every status, or a literal label to substring-match
fuel_typeNoIsolate a fuel by inclusive substring match on the raw label; comma/semicolon-separated for a union, e.g. 'gas' hits GAS/Natural Gas, 'nuclear,hydro' unions both. Runs the fuel filter server-side instead of post-filtering survivors in context
max_fiber_kmNoKeep only survivors within N km of the nearest MAPPED long-haul fiber route endpoint — coarse backbone proximity from a sparse ~260-node dataset over a county-centroid origin, NOT last-mile fiber. Implies geocoded rows only
baseload_onlyNoKeep only firm/dispatchable fuel (nuclear, gas, steam, geothermal, hydro, coal); exclude wind/solar/storage. Firm-vs-intermittent split only — does NOT sub-divide peaker vs combined-cycle gas (no duty-cycle field in the queue). Default false
geocoded_onlyNoKeep only survivors that carry lat/lng (~83% of the queue) — the ones with a ready site_evaluation_handoff you can pipe into analyze_site. Default false
max_ttp_monthsNoMax time-to-power in months (ISO-level avg interconnection wait; HARD cut keeping projects in ISOs at/under this — PJM ~51, CAISO ~40, ISO-NE ~34, MISO ~34, ERCOT ~33, NYISO ~31, SPP ~24; <=30 leaves only SPP)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
_entityNoPayload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
citationNoMachine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
provenanceNoCollection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
_front_doorNoIn-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
_return_loopNoSuggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
site_evaluation_handoffNoPre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds critical behavior details: max_ttp_months is a HARD ISO cut with specific numbers, geocoded_only guarantees frozen coordinates, and the candidate contract with 7-day TTL and deterministic expiration. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured, starting with the core concept, followed by parameter details, usage guidance, and the candidate contract. It is somewhat long but every sentence adds value; no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the description is highly complete: it covers purpose, usage, parameter nuances, output shape (backed by an output schema), example queries, and the candidate lifecycle. It fully prepares an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful context beyond the schema: an example query, the interpretation of max_ttp_months as a hard ISO-level cut with per-ISO values, and the baseload_only firm-vs-intermittent clarification. This enriches the parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs server-side SET-REDUCTION over the US ISO interconnection queue, returning only survivors. It explicitly distinguishes from siblings by saying 'do NOT use for the ISO-level GW aggregate (use get_interconnection_queue) or a single-site read (use analyze_site)'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidance is provided: 'Use for high-cardinality siting/arbitrage scans' and 'do NOT use' for alternatives, naming get_interconnection_queue and analyze_site. It also describes chaining to analyze_site via site_evaluation_handoff.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/azmartone67/dchub-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server