Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub — Data Center & Energy Intelligence

Related Servers

Alternatives to DC Hub — Data Center & Energy Intelligence

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing distributed industrial asset data (battery storage, EV chargers, solar arrays) with tools for asset status, geospatial search, alerts, anomaly explanation, and load simulation.
      556 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Kardashev Labs US grid data, giving agents live LMP, carbon intensity, load, curtailment, interconnection queues, ERCOT large loads, and the public RT-DA spread forecast track record. Requires no API key.
      11
      31 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server wrapping worldmonitor global intelligence dashboard, exposing 140 tools across 32 services for live market, geopolitical, military, cyber, climate, and supply chain data.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      One-call Australian energy-market plumbing via AEMO — cited, structured responses for market data and analysis, not a data broker.
      5
      140 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server granting AI agents access to 20M+ SEC EDGAR filings, 100M+ exhibits, and comprehensive entity data through 49 tools, with support for raw documents, extracted sections, and structured JSON.
      27 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 91 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each of the 91 tools has a clearly distinct purpose, and descriptions extensively cross-reference alternatives (e.g., 'Do NOT use for...' and 'Front Door Check' guidance). Even overlapping areas like grid data (get_grid_data, get_grid_intelligence, get_grid_scoreboard) are unambiguously separated by scope and parameters, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_*, list_*, search_*, compare_*, rank_*, save_*, set_*), with only a few standalone verbs (fetch, search) that remain clear. No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verb styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    91 tools vastly exceeds the 25+ threshold considered excessive, even for a comprehensive platform. While the domain is broad, the sheer number overwhelms agents, though meta-tools like discover_tools and execute_plan mitigate navigation issues.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is exceptionally complete, covering facility discovery, market ranking, grid/power analysis, fiber/water/risk assessment, news/deals, pipeline, permitting, tax, alerts, shortlists, research, and account management. No obvious gaps; even meta-tools for planning and discovery are included.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive