Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub: Data Center, Power Grid & Energy Intelligence

Get Composite Site Score

get_composite_site_score
Read-onlyIdempotent

Calculates a 0–100 data center site suitability score for a latitude/longitude and reports which factors are validated vs unavailable, without imputing missing data.

Instructions

Use this when the user wants one 0-100 data center site suitability verdict for a lat/lon WITH an explicit per-factor coverage map — which factors are actually measured vs. declared unavailable. Unlike analyze_site (full raw data dump), this scores ONLY over VALIDATED factors and never imputes a missing one: power/grid, fiber, natural-hazard risk (FEMA NRI) and water (live WRI Aqueduct 4.0 baseline water stress) are all live; water is "unavailable" only outside basin coverage (never faked); market/DCPI is v1-unavailable (use rank_markets). Example: get_composite_site_score lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 state=AZ. Returns {composite_score (0-100 over validated factors), verdict (BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID), confidence (complete|conditional), coverage {power_grid|fiber|water|risk_resilience|market_dcpi: validated|unavailable}, coverage_ratio, sub_scores, caveats}. Use analyze_site for full data, compare_sites for 2-4 sites, rank_markets for whole-market ranking.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
latNoSite latitude in decimal degrees (-90 to 90, required), e.g. 33.45
lngNoAlias for lon — either name works
lonNoSite longitude in decimal degrees (-180 to 180, required), e.g. -112.07
stateNoUS state abbreviation (optional) — improves water/context lookups, e.g. AZ
latitudeNoAlias for lat — either name works
longitudeNoAlias for lon — either name works

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changedv2.12.45
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -{}New value: +true
    • removedOutput schema / description
      Removed value: -"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _entity
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _front_door
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Next-session delta call (get_changes).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / quota
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": {},
      -        "properties": {},
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
      -}
  2. Changed8 schema fields changedv2.12.43
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys."New value: +"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _entity / description
      Previous value: -"Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest."New value: +"Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _front_door / description
      Previous value: -"In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan."New value: +"First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop / description
      Previous value: -"Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed."New value: +"Next-session delta call (get_changes)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."New value: +"How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / provenance / description
      Previous value: -"Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing."New value: +"Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / quota / description
      Previous value: -"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available."New value: +"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / description
      Previous value: -"Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."New value: +"Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  4. Changed5 schema fields changedv2.3.20
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
      Removed value: -"object"
  5. Changed4 schema fields changedv2.3.12
    • addedInput schema / properties / latitude
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Alias for lat — either name works",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / lng
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Alias for lon — either name works",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / longitude
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Alias for lon — either name works",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "_entity": {
      +      "description": "Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "_front_door": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "_return_loop": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "citation": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "provenance": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "quota": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "site_evaluation_handoff": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "items": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {},
      +            "properties": {},
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "properties": {},
      +          "type": "object"
      +        }
      +      ],
      +      "description": "Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Addedv2.3.8

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safe-read profile (readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/openWorld=false); the description adds genuinely unavailable context: no imputation of missing factors, live provenance per factor (FEMA NRI, WRI Aqueduct 4.0), the rule that water is 'unavailable' rather than faked outside basin coverage, and that market/DCPI is v1-unavailable. This is exactly the operational nuance annotations cannot express.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and coverage-map distinction are front-loaded, and the alternatives are consolidated at the end. It is dense but long — the explicit return-shape enumeration duplicates an output schema that already exists, which is the one stretch that doesn't earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a scoring tool with an output schema present, the description still covers everything an agent needs: verdict scale (0-100, BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID), confidence semantics, coverage values (validated|unavailable), and the no-imputation contract that determines how results should be interpreted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the lat/lon/state/alias semantics are already documented, making 3 the baseline. The description adds a concrete example call (lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 state=AZ) but never mentions the lng/latitude/longitude aliases or that state is optional-but-helpful, so it adds little beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence states a specific verb (score) and resource (composite site suitability for a lat/lon) plus the distinguishing artifact: an explicit per-factor coverage map. It explicitly contrasts itself with analyze_site ('full raw data dump') and with the scoring scope ('scores ONLY over VALIDATED factors'), so an agent can separate it from siblings without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states the triggering condition ('when the user wants one 0-100 verdict WITH a coverage map') and then routes three alternatives by scenario: analyze_site for full data, compare_sites for 2-4 sites, rank_markets for whole-market ranking. Exclusions and substitutes are both explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools