Skip to main content
Glama
azmartone67

DC Hub: Data Center, Power Grid & Energy Intelligence

Citation Block

summarize_for_citation
Read-onlyIdempotent

Generates a paste-ready attribution line with the correct per-layer licence for citing DC Hub data center or power figures.

Instructions

Use this when you quote a DC Hub data center or power figure: returns one paste-ready attribution line for the value you are about to cite, with the CORRECT licence for that layer. Pass what you read off the response you are citing: subject (what the figure is), as_of (the provenance as_of), url (the row's profile_url or dcpi_url), completeness (the completeness flag), and layer. ★ LICENCE IS PER LAYER AND THIS IS THE POINT: DCPI verdicts and composite scores (CC-BY-4.0 30 days after the day they describe; current values: quote up to five markets per piece, republishing needs a DCPI licence, https://dchub.cloud/terms#dcpi-current-data), band thresholds, methodology and DC Hub's own grid/site analysis (CC-BY-4.0) are yours to quote with attribution; the facility inventory and third-party physical layers are COMPOSITES whose upstream terms DC Hub cannot waive (parts are OpenStreetMap, ODbL 1.0, share-alike), so they carry a pointer to https://dchub.cloud/data-sources instead of a grant. A flat "CC-BY-4.0" over a facility record is an over-claim. Returns {citation_text, cite_as, license, license_basis, source, url, as_of, as_of_basis, completeness, omitted}. Free, no key, no network call — it assembles what you pass and never resolves or invents a value.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNoThe profile_url or dcpi_url from the cited row. Must be a dchub.cloud URL; anything else is dropped and named in `omitted`.
as_ofNoThe as_of you read off the cited response (provenance.as_of). Omit it and the line says RETRIEVED instead of claiming a data date.
layerNoWhich layer the figure came from: dcpi | grid_analysis | facility_inventory | physical_infrastructure | deals | other. Decides the licence line; omit and you get the scoped statement rather than a grant.
subjectNoWhat you are citing, in the words you will show the human, e.g. "Ashburn DCPI verdict" or "ERCOT interconnection queue depth"
completenessNoThe completeness flag from the cited response, if it carried one

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changedv2.12.45
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -{}New value: +true
    • removedOutput schema / description
      Removed value: -"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _entity
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _front_door
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Next-session delta call (get_changes).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing.",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / quota
      Removed value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier).",
      -  "properties": {},
      -  "type": "object"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": {},
      -        "properties": {},
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "additionalProperties": {},
      -      "properties": {},
      -      "type": "object"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "description": "Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
      -}
  2. Changed8 schema fields changedv2.12.43
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys."New value: +"DC Hub envelope: tool data fields ride at the top level beside these keys."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _entity / description
      Previous value: -"Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest."New value: +"Payload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _front_door / description
      Previous value: -"In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan."New value: +"First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _return_loop / description
      Previous value: -"Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed."New value: +"Next-session delta call (get_changes)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."New value: +"How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / provenance / description
      Previous value: -"Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing."New value: +"Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / quota / description
      Previous value: -"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available."New value: +"Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier)."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / description
      Previous value: -"Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."New value: +"Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnly/idempotent/openWorld=false), it discloses that the call is free, needs no key, makes no network call, and 'never resolves or invents a value' — a critical anti-hallucination guarantee. It also discloses the failure mode (non-dchub.cloud URLs are dropped and named in `omitted`) and the licence-policy rationale for composite layers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The trigger is correctly front-loaded, but the body is a single dense run-on packed with parentheticals, two URLs, and a ★ marker. The licence taxonomy is genuinely complex, yet the content could be split into short sentences and the return-field list dropped since an output schema exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-required-parameter assembly utility, the description covers the trigger, the provenance chain for each input, the licence decision rules per layer, and the degradation behavior when inputs are missing or invalid. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all five parameters including the omission consequences for `as_of` and `layer`. The description adds the workflow framing ('pass what you read off the response you are citing') but largely restates what the schema says, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and artifact: it returns one paste-ready attribution line with the correct per-layer licence for a figure you are about to cite. No sibling tool in the list does citation assembly, and the description makes that role unmistakable within the first clause.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use this when you quote a DC Hub data center or power figure' gives an explicit trigger, and the warning that 'a flat CC-BY-4.0 over a facility record is an over-claim' tells the agent what not to do instead. The call-site inputs are also enumerated, so the agent knows what to gather before invoking.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools