ebay_update_bidding_strategy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description should reveal behavioral traits. It only states the action 'update' without discussing side effects, reversibility, permissions, or rate limits. The schema shows enum values but description doesn't clarify behavior for FIXED vs. DYNAMIC.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficient and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite schema richness, the description lacks details on return value, side effects, and whether the tool is idempotent. For a mutation tool, prerequisites (e.g., campaign existence) are not mentioned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema adequately documents both parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates the bidding strategy for a CPC campaign, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like ebay_update_campaign_budget or ebay_update_ad_rate_strategy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., ebay_update_campaign_budget for budget changes). No context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.