ebay_delete_package
Delete a package from eBay using its package ID. Removes the specified package from records.
Instructions
Delete a package by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to delete |
Delete a package from eBay using its package ID. Removes the specified package from records.
Delete a package by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description alone only states 'Delete a package by ID'. It does not disclose if the deletion is permanent, requires specific permissions, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence but lacks any structure or additional details. It earns its place but is too brief to be considered well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), the description barely covers the tool's purpose. It omits return value or effects, making it incomplete for an agent's understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for 'packageId', and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's description. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and resource ('a package by ID'). However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'ebay_bulk_delete_packages' which performs a similar bulk operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'ebay_bulk_delete_packages'. No context about prerequisites or success conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/YosefHayim/ebay-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server