ebay_get_bundle
Fetch complete details of an eBay bundle, including included items and pricing, using the bundle ID.
Instructions
Get bundle details by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bundleId | Yes | The bundle ID |
Fetch complete details of an eBay bundle, including included items and pricing, using the bundle ID.
Get bundle details by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bundleId | Yes | The bundle ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral transparency, but it only states a basic read operation. It does not disclose any behavioral traits like data returned, side effects, or error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that directly states the purpose with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient for a simple retrieval operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple nature of a get-by-ID operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context. It lacks details on authentication or response structure, but these are often implicit for such tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema coverage, the single parameter 'bundleId' has a description 'The bundle ID'. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, meeting the baseline but not exceeding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get bundle details by ID' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (bundle details), and specifies the identifying method (by ID). It differentiates itself from siblings like ebay_create_bundle and ebay_cancel_bundle.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as prerequisites, required permissions, or when not to use it. This lack of context makes it harder for an AI agent to decide appropriately.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/YosefHayim/ebay-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server