ebay_suggest_keywords

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not state that the tool is read-only (likely only returns suggestions), nor does it mention required permissions or side effects. The word 'suggest' implies no mutation but is not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, front-loaded with the purpose. It is concise with no fluff, but could be more informative without significant length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters, a nested object, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It omits what the tool returns, how the request body impacts suggestions, and any prerequisites. The tool's complexity demands more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds no extra value beyond the schema; it does not explain constraints or formatting of the bid object or other fields. Baseline 3 is appropriate given schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the verb 'suggest' and resource 'keywords', indicating it returns keyword suggestions via the eBay Marketing API. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like ebay_create_keyword or ebay_suggest_items, and the read-only nature of 'suggest' is not explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description lacks context on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ebay_create_keyword (for adding keywords) or ebay_suggest_bids. An agent has no guidance on prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.