ebay_get_offers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, whether authentication is required, rate limits, or any side effects. The generic verb 'Get' implies reading, but this is not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 6 words, very concise. However, it sacrifices completeness. It is front-loaded but lacks context that would help an AI agent decide to use this tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three optional parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools (e.g., ebay_get_offer, ebay_get_offers_to_buyers), the description is too minimal. It does not specify the meaning of 'offers' in this domain, behavior with no filters, or relationship to other offer-related tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate because the schema already explains each parameter. However, the description could clarify that filters are optional and what happens when omitted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get all offers for the seller' clearly states the action (get) and resource (offers) with scope. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like ebay_get_offer or ebay_get_offers_to_buyers, and the word 'all' contradicts the optional filters (sku, marketplaceId) that allow partial retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, ebay_get_offer (singular) likely retrieves a single offer, but no comparison is provided. No mention of prerequisites, filters, or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.