ebay_confirm_package
Confirm a package for shipping by providing its package ID.
Instructions
Confirm a package for shipping
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to confirm |
Confirm a package for shipping by providing its package ID.
Confirm a package for shipping
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to confirm |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as side effects (e.g., state change), idempotency, or error handling. The agent is left uninformed about the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no excess words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about return values and prerequisites. It is minimally adequate for a simple operation but leaves gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate; no extra value is provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Confirm a package for shipping' clearly identifies the verb (confirm) and resource (package), and adds context ('for shipping') that distinguishes it from related tools like ebay_cancel_package. However, it does not fully elaborate on what 'confirm' entails operationally.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidelines are provided regarding when to use this tool versus alternatives like ebay_bulk_confirm_packages or ebay_cancel_package. The description gives no context on prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/YosefHayim/ebay-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server