bookshelf_update_releaseprofile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'WRITE: this modifies your Bookshelf instance,' which matches readOnlyHint: false but adds no new behavioral detail beyond the annotation. It doesn't disclose side effects, idempotency, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded, but the first line is essentially a restatement of the tool name. The write warning is useful but adds little beyond what annotations already convey.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the nested 'body' object with additionalProperties: true, the description should clarify expected structure or provide examples. None is given, leaving the tool under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has no parameter descriptions (0% coverage), and the description doesn't explain 'id' or 'body.' With body being an open-ended object, the agent has no clue what properties to pass.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update releaseprofile' clearly identifying the action and resource. While it doesn't detail specific fields or distinguish from other update tools, the resource name makes the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_releaseprofile or delete_releaseprofile. The note about writing adds no selection context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.