bookshelf_update_importlist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description simply reiterates that the operation is a write ('WRITE: this modifies your Bookshelf instance'), which is already implied by readOnlyHint=false. It adds no unique behavioral context such as side effects, required permissions, or consequences. The mention of 'Query params: forceSave' hints at a parameter but doesn't explain its behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short and front-loaded with 'Update importlist.' However, the phrase 'Query params: forceSave' is potentially confusing and could be inaccurate, though it doesn't add clutter. It is concise but at the expense of necessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a three-parameter tool with a nested object and an output schema, yet the description offers almost no context. It fails to explain what an importlist is, what fields can be updated, when to use it, or how it differs from bulk operations. The description is wholly inadequate for an agent to invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description needed to explain the parameters but only mentions 'forceSave' without elaboration. It does not clarify that 'id' identifies which importlist to update or that 'body' contains the fields to change. No additional meaning beyond the schema's bare property names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'importlist', making the tool's basic purpose obvious. It distinguishes from siblings like 'bulk_update_importlist' by implying a single importlist, but it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus related tools such as create_importlist, bulk_update_importlist, or get_importlist. There is no mention of prerequisites or typical scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.