bookshelf_update_config_host

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds that it 'modifies your Bookshelf instance,' which reinforces the write nature but does not provide new behavioral context such as required permissions, reversibility, or effects on existing settings. With annotations covering the safety profile, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences: 'Update config host.' and 'WRITE: this modifies your Bookshelf instance.' It is front-loaded with the purpose and contains zero unnecessary words, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has two parameters with no descriptions and an output schema not referenced, the description is insufficient for an agent to invoke it correctly. It provides no information about the body structure, the meaning of id, or how this update affects the system. The presence of siblings like get_config_host remains unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description provides no explanation of the parameters (id, body). It does not state what id refers to or what body should contain. Since the schema also lacks descriptions, the description fails to compensate, leaving the agent without essential parameter guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Update config host' clearly states the verb (update) and resource (config host), which is specific enough to understand the action. However, it does not distinguish itself from sibling update tools like update_config_downloadclient or update_config_naming, so it lacks differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'WRITE:' prefix and 'this modifies your Bookshelf instance' imply it is for modifying host configuration, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives (e.g., get_config_host for reading). No exclusions or alternative tool mentions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.