bookshelf_update_delayprofile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'WRITE: this modifies your Bookshelf instance,' but annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, so this adds no new information. No mention of behavior on invalid id, merge semantics, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (two sentences) with no fluff, and the key action is front-loaded. However, its brevity comes at the cost of substance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an update tool with a generic body object, the description is inadequate. It doesn't explain what fields can be updated, how the body is applied, or how to obtain the id. The presence of an output schema doesn't compensate for missing input semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention any parameters. Schema description coverage is 0%, leaving the id and body fields completely unexplained. The open-ended body object is particularly under-specified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update delayprofile' with a specific verb and resource, and the verb differentiates it from sibling tools like create/delete/get/reorder. However, it offers no further details about what an update entails, making it clear but minimal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus create/delete/reorder alternatives. No prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative recommendations are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.