bookshelf_delete_command

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The 'DESTRUCTIVE: this deletes data' text only restates the destructiveHint=true annotation and adds no new context about permanence, side effects, authorization requirements, or exactly what data is removed. Since the annotation already conveys destructiveness, the description contributes no additional behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, stating the core purpose in the first two words. The DESTRUCTIVE warning is somewhat redundant with the annotation and 'Delete command', but the overall size is appropriate and there is no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive one-parameter tool, the description is too thin to fully equip the agent. It omits critical operational context such as how to source the id, whether deletion is reversible, and what side effects may occur, leaving the agent to infer safe usage from the annotation and schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate for the undocumented 'id' parameter but never mentions it. The schema alone shows an integer 'id' is required, but the description does not clarify which command it refers to or how the agent can obtain a valid id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'command', making the tool's purpose immediately clear and distinguishing it from delete tools for other resource types like author or book. However, it does not explain what a 'command' is in this system or differentiate itself from sibling tools like run_command or list_command, so it does not reach a full 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not state when deleting a command is appropriate, mention prerequisites (e.g., that the command must exist), or point to sibling tools such as list_command for finding the relevant id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.