bookshelf_update_config_downloadclient

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'WRITE: this modifies your Bookshelf instance,' which aligns with readOnlyHint: false but adds little beyond that annotation. It does not disclose specific behaviors like which configuration fields are affected, whether changes are reversible, or any side effects. The annotation already signals a write operation, so the description provides minimal added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with a direct action statement followed by a warning. Every word is purposeful, and it avoids unnecessary fluff. It is structurally efficient, though slightly under-specified in content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested objects, arbitrary body) and lack of parameter documentation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what 'config downloadclient' is, what the body should contain, or how this update differs from other update tools. The output schema exists, so return values are covered, but input and usage context are severely lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate, but it provides no information about the 'id' or 'body' parameters. Since 'body' has additionalProperties: true, it is critical to clarify what keys are valid, but the description offers no such guidance. This is a major gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update config downloadclient,' which essentially restates the tool name without explaining what 'config downloadclient' refers to or how it differs from similar tools like bookshelf_update_downloadclient. The verb 'Update' is present but the resource is ambiguous and lacks specifics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as bookshelf_update_downloadclient or bookshelf_get_config_downloadclient. The 'WRITE' warning is a safety indicator, not usage guidance, and no prerequisites or scenarios are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.