bookshelf_list_releaseprofile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already indicates a safe read operation, and the description's 'List' is consistent with it. However, the description adds no further behavioral context, such as return format or pagination, which is minimal for a zero-parameter list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, with no wasted words. It is not under-specified to the point of confusion, but the single sentence lacks the richer context that could elevate it further.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, read-only annotation, and an output schema), the description is largely complete. It clearly identifies the resource, and the output schema presumably covers return values. However, it could be slightly clearer by saying 'List all release profiles.'

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

This tool has zero parameters, so schema coverage is effectively 100%. The description correctly says nothing about parameters, which is appropriate. Baseline for 0 params is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List releaseprofile.' uses a clear verb and resource, and distinguishes from 'get_releaseprofile' by implying a list of all profiles rather than a single one. However, it doesn't explicitly say 'all' or 'multiple', which is a minor gap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_releaseprofile' or 'create_releaseprofile'. The verb 'list' implies a bulk operation, but no explicit context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.