bookshelf_get_releaseprofile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'Fetch', which aligns with the readOnlyHint: true annotation. It adds little beyond the annotation, providing no extra context such as error behavior or response format, but it does not contradict the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the action and resource, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-id tool with one parameter and an output schema present, the description is complete enough. It does not need to explain return values, but it could mention that it is part of the releaseprofile CRUD family or provide context about error cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required 'id' (integer) with 0% description coverage. The description mentions 'by id', clarifying that the parameter is the releaseprofile identifier, but it does not elaborate on the id's source or meaning beyond what the schema implies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Fetch a single releaseprofile by id', which clearly identifies the verb (fetch), the resource (releaseprofile), and the scope (by id). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_releaseprofile which fetch multiple records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that this is for retrieving one specific releaseprofile or suggest list for multiple, nor does it reference any alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.