bookshelf_list_edition

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=true already covers the read-only nature, so no safety concern is missing. However, the description adds no behavioral context—no details on return format, pagination, or any side effects. The only added info is the parameter, which is a schema detail, not a behavioral trait.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, but it is structurally disjointed: a fragment 'List edition.' followed by 'Query params: bookId.' It is efficient in word count but omits necessary context, making it under-specified rather than well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only one parameter and an output schema, the description still fails to provide essential context. It does not explain what an edition is, how bookId filters the results, or why one would use this tool. The sparse text is insufficient for an agent to confidently select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'bookId' but the schema property is 'book_id', creating a naming mismatch. It doesn't explain the array type, optionality, or the filtering behavior, leaving the parameter's meaning ambiguous and under-explained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a 'List edition' action, which is a specific verb and resource. It also mentions a query parameter, bookId, hinting at filtering by book. However, it doesn't elaborate on what an edition is or distinguish this from sibling list tools like list_book, so it lacks full differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or context about when listing editions is appropriate, leaving the agent without direction among many sibling list tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.