list_slices
Retrieve all slices from an Aseprite sprite, including their bounds, center, and pivot points.
Instructions
List all slices in the sprite with their bounds, center, and pivot.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filename | Yes |
Retrieve all slices from an Aseprite sprite, including their bounds, center, and pivot points.
List all slices in the sprite with their bounds, center, and pivot.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filename | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description bears full burden. It describes a read-only listing of slice properties, which is transparent but lacks disclosure of potential side effects or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no redundancy, efficiently conveying the tool's purpose and output.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides essential function but omits response format and any limitations. Adequate but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage and only one parameter (filename), the description does not add any meaning beyond the schema. It does not clarify the expected value or format of the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'List' and resource 'slices' and details the returned information (bounds, center, pivot), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like add_slice or remove_slice.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any mention of prerequisites or context. The description is purely declarative.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MalloyTheDev/aseprite-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server