salvar_opcao_tabela_opcoes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only says 'criar' (create). It does not disclose whether this is an insert-or-update, idempotent, or if it requires specific permissions. Minimal behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, concise but not structured. Could be improved by front-loading key info. Not overly long, but lacks organization.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 2 required parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. Lacks parameter explanations and usage guidelines, making it insufficient for an agent to use correctly without guessing. Incomplete given no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to parameters 'nome' and 'tabela_id'. It does not explain that nome is the option name and tabela_id identifies the table. Relies solely on minimal schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'criar uma opção em uma tabela de opções' (create an option in an options table), specifying the action and resource. It differentiates from listing or deleting options, but there is a similar sibling 'salvar_opcao_tabela' which is not distinguished.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidelines on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'garantir_opcoes_tabela_opcoes' or 'salvar_opcao_tabela'. Missing context on prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.