excluir_grupo_produto

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavioral traits. While it indicates a destructive action (deletion), it does not elaborate on irreversibility, authorization needs, or potential side effects like cascading deletes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence and easy to read, but it is overly brief. While concise, it sacrifices valuable detail that could improve usability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete operation with no output schema, the description should at least mention success/failure behavior or prerequisites (e.g., group must exist). Lacking these, it feels incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning to the sole parameter 'id_grupo'. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description should explain what the parameter represents, but it does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Excluir' meaning delete) and the resource ('grupo de produto' product group) with context ('do Ploomes CRM'). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like excluir_cliente or excluir_familia_produto.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus other delete tools, nor does it mention prerequisites or consequences. Users are left to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.