buscar_pecas_produto

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description provides minimal behavior info: it searches for parts. It does not disclose whether it is read-only, how results are paginated (despite a pagina parameter), or any side effects. The agent cannot infer key behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence), but it is underspecified for a tool with three parameters. While it has no fluff, it sacrifices completeness, requiring the agent to infer usage from parameter names alone.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the tool returns, how filtering works, or how to interpret the result. The agent cannot confidently use this tool without additional knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning parameter descriptions are missing. The tool description does not explain the nome, pagina, or produto_id parameters, leaving the agent without guidance on their format or meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for parts/components of products in Ploomes CRM, distinguishing it from siblings like salvar_peca_produto and excluir_peca_produto. However, it could be more specific about the scope of what is searched (e.g., by name or product ID).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like buscar_produtos or buscar_familias_produto. The description does not mention any prerequisites or exclusions, leaving the AI agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.